Fire Prevention Advocacy Toolkit

A Guide to Fire Prevention Advocacy

  • Intro
  • CREATE DEMAND
    • Increase Advocacy for Fire Prevention in Your Community
    • A Comprehensive Advocacy Plan
    • Advocating for Increased Fire Prevention Will Benefit Your Community
  • DEMONSTRATE NEED
    • Fire Prevention Benefits from Accurate and Complete Data
    • Fire Costs Lives and Injuries
    • Fire Costs Dollars
    • Fire Costs Businesses, Jobs and Community
    • National Data Support Local Efforts
    • The Consequences of Not Investing in Prevention
  • DEMONSTRATE RESULTS
    • Documenting Results Helps Justify Your Investment
    • Evaluation
    • Fire Prevention Saves Lives
    • Fire Prevention Saves Dollars and Community
  • RELATIONSHIPS
    • Develop Relationships in Your Community
    • Policymakers
    • Business Leaders
    • Community Social Service Leaders
    • The Public
  • YOUR PLAN
    • Set Your Advocacy Program Objectives
    • Develop Your Advocacy Program Strategies
    • Work with Local Advocates
    • Use Real Life Stories as Inspiration
  • RESOURCES
    • Media Relations And Outreach
    • Successful Media Relations
    • Communicating Via the Internet and Social Media
    • Hosting Press Conferences and Other Events
    • Communication Sources
    • Using the Vision 20/20 “Prevention Saves” Video
    • Making Effective Presentations

Fire Costs Businesses, Jobs and Community

DEMONSTRATE NEED

Fire Costs Businesses, Jobs and Community

Localize the Impact of Fire
burned townhouses

Demonstrate the Cost of Blight

Help leaders in your community understand how burnt out buildings often stand for weeks or even months before being demolished or restored. The sight of an abandoned building can depress property values and degrade the quality of life for the surrounding community. They can become dangerous as children are tempted to explore them and as centers for criminal activity or illegal trespass.

Show how oftentimes, businesses that suffer significant fires never reopen. This results in lost jobs. It reduces local tax revenue and can impact the community’s ability to attract tourism and industry. The company no longer has a need for local goods, services and products; and unemployed workers curtail their local spending and increase reliance upon social services. These are typical results and they remind us that fire’s impact has a long reach throughout the community.

burned building
Image courtesy of Sarah Belham (public domain)

The PDF file National Vacant Properties Campaign documented the negative impact of vacant properties on communities:

A study in Austin, Texas, found that “blocks with unsecured [vacant] buildings had 3.2 times as many drug calls to police, 1.8 times as many theft calls, and twice the number of violent calls” as blocks without vacant buildings.

More than 12,000 fires break out in vacant structures each year in the United States, resulting in $73 million in property damage annually. Most are the result of arson. 

During a five-year period, St. Louis spent $15.5 million, or nearly $100 per household, to demolish vacant buildings. Detroit spends $800,000 per year and Philadelphia spends $1,846,745 per year cleaning vacant lots. 

A 2001 study in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, found that houses within 150 feet of a vacant or abandoned property experienced a net loss of $7,627 in value. 

The Environmental Cost of Fire

picture of a fieldStructural fires release vast quantities of toxins into the environment. Besides carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulphur dioxide (SO2), an FM Global study found greenhouse gases, metals, air toxics and semi-volatile organic air toxics all released into the air.

Fire department suppression requires the use of tremendous quantities of water under high pressure. In addition to water usage, the runoff can be damaging to the environment. Fires also generate large volumes of solid wastes that have to be disposed of in landfills.

Prevention efforts can dramatically reduce the impact of fire on the environment by reducing pollution, saving water and limiting the waste that enters landfills. As one example, according to the 2010 report, Environmental Impact of Automatic Fire Sprinklers, published by FM Global as part of its joint research effort with the Home Fire Sprinkler Coalition, greenhouse gases can be reduced by 98 percent when fire sprinklers are installed.

“The methodology shows that in all occupancies, from residential dwellings, to office buildings, to high-hazard facilities, the lack of proper risk management and effective fire protection, e.g., automatic fire sprinklers, statistically increases carbon emissions over the life cycle of the occupancy.”
– FM Global

© 2015–2023 · Utility Pro.